Piles of folders for article on Fulford Inquiry CategoriesLatest Expert Views Community Expert View Education Expert View Health Expert View Our Expert Views

Southport Inquiry highlights how Prevent deprofessionalises public services

The Southport Inquiry embodies our warning that the Prevent duty has created conditions in which teachers, social workers and other frontline professionals are increasingly unable to act on their own expertise, and are required to defer to a counter-terrorism framework, writes Dr Layla Aitlhadj. In January of 2025, then Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, announced there would be a public inquiry into the Southport attack that took the lives of 3 young girls, injured many more and left their families and the nation in grief. Following the trial of the perpetrator, Axel Rudukubana, it had become public knowledge that he had been known to several agencies and referred to Prevent three times. The inquiry was described by the Home Secretary as a way to “get to the truth of what happened and what needs to change”. The next day Prime Minister Keir Starmer re-emphasised the fact that the perpetrator had been […]

Prevent duty in Scotland CategoriesLatest Expert Views Community Expert View Education Expert View Health Expert View Our Expert Views

How is the Prevent duty in Scotland implemented and who is standing against it?

Legal guidance compels the Prevent duty in Scotland so public authorities must implement the policy. A closer look at key differences in their approach provides insights for action and directs us to the organisations resisting the Prevent duty in Scotland. By Zara W. Tahir National security, and by extension, counter terrorism, remains a reserved matter in Scotland, and therefore under Westminster control.  However, one arm of the counter-terorrism strategy, the Prevent duty, requires the cooperation of public institutions north of the border, many of which are devolved.  This tension between reserved and devolved powers has led to key differences in how the Prevent duty is implemented in Scotland compared to the rest of the UK, particularly England. Scottish MPs voice concerns with Prevent  In 2015, the Counterterrorism and Security Act was debated for five days in the UK Parliament. MPs raised concerns about its application in Scotland; these criticisms of the […]

Picture of high school students for Prevent duty in education CategoriesLatest Expert Views Community Expert View Education Expert View Our Expert Views

Challenging the Prevent duty in securitised schools

Our recent webinar explored the Prevent duty in securitised schools, the recent aspects that further strengthen Prevent and what Prevent Watch can do to challenge referrals.  By Mariam A Schools in the UK have increasingly become sites of securitisation, rather than safe places for learning and free expression. One of several changes that has facilitated this in the last decade is the introduction of Prevent – part of the UK’s counter-terrorism strategy CONTEST – as a statutory duty for educators. This presence of the Prevent duty in education has contributed to the increased security and surveillance in classrooms, which has been flagged as a concern by several human rights groups as well as the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education. These concerns are shared by Prevent Watch. In our recent webinar, we explored how Prevent has contributed to […]

Picture of fried chicken for a story criticizing the Prevent strategy in the UK and Channel deradicalisation for children with unmet mental health needs CategoriesLatest Expert Views Education Expert View Health Expert View Our Expert Views

Why the Channel programme linked to the Prevent strategy is the junk food of public safety

In 2005, when Jamie Oliver exposed what really went into chicken nuggets on his School Dinners series, parents were horrified. What they thought was a proper hot meal turned out to be processed scraps, stripped of nutrition and bulked out with additives. The same reaction should meet the Channel programme. Promoted as safeguarding against radicalisation, it is in reality a highly processed product: stripped of genuine social care and support, repackaged with the additives of counter-terrorism, and sold back to us as if it were the nourishment required for a healthy society. According to the Home Office statistics, 5,014 individuals have been referred to Channel for ‘de-radicalisation’ since 2015. A Channel intervention is linked to the Prevent strategy in the UK. Out of a total number (58,127) of Prevent referrals as a result of the strategy, just 8.6% are deemed to be at risk of ‘radicalisation’ and deemed suitable for […]

Picture for article on pre-crime policies of a man wearing a Muslim energy shirt CategoriesLatest Expert Views Community Expert View Education Expert View Our Expert Views

Like Prevent, pre-crime policies used in the past created the notion of ‘thought crime’

Pre-crime policies in Japan and Russia prior to World War 2 reveal uncanny similarities to the UK’s Prevent strategy and relied on the same social elements to be acceptable.  By Zara W. Tahir The Prevent strategy has often been referred to as a ‘pre-crime’ strategy. Pre-crime is defined as a grey area where a crime has not yet occurred, and yet is implicitly understood to possibly occur. Its origins lie in science fiction. A study by Lucia Zedner at the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies states that pre-crime, “… has a tendency to validate developments that ought properly to be subject to intense debate. It licences changes in procedural arrangements, as well as in substantive law, that erode civil liberties and permit intrusive coercive measures to be imposed ahead of wrongdoing.” People express surprise that such a policy has arisen in the UK. But Prevent is not without precedent […]

children referred to prevent counter-terrorism palestinian activism jewish news CategoriesCommunity Expert View Education Expert View Latest Expert Views Our Expert Views

Ramadan Reflection: Inspiration from a mum of girl referred to counter-terrorism for saying ‘free Palestine’

Several months ago, I was contacted by a mother whose daughter had been excluded from school and referred to Prevent for saying “Free Palestine”.  This is just one of many cases we see at Prevent Watch, some of which include young children being referred to counter-terrorism for questioning under Prevent, simply for expressing support for Palestine and Palestinians. In this case, an academically bright and principled teenager who stood for what she believed in was being penalised by a school that should have been nurturing her growth, not silencing her voice. This mother was upset and shocked by the lies that the school had told to cover their backs. She reached out to Prevent Watch for support and as I spoke to her on the phone she repeated the words:  “HasbunAllahu wa ni’ma al-wakeel” – translated as “Allah is enough for us, and He is the best disposer of our affairs.” These words […]

empty school desks for story on how uk prevent duty erodes children's rights to safe education CategoriesCommunity Expert View Education Expert View Latest Expert Views Our Expert Views

UN Submission: How the UK Prevent duty erodes children’s right to safety in education

A summary of our submission to the UN outlining how Prevent makes school an unsafe space especially for targeted children, with serious implications for children’s well-being. This submission addresses how Prevent undermines the right to safety in education under International Human Rights law. Download Prevent Watch’s full final 2025 submission to the UN on how Prevent violates the right to a safe education. The issues raised are framed in response to specific questions posed by the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education in her call for contributions. We have published this as the UK government approves the Children’s Well-being and Schools BIll that seeks to “break the link between young people’s background and their future success”. A Prevent referral – even when it is determined to be unnecessary as in 85% of cases – can follow a child through their life, seriously impacting their well-being and success. Since […]

Kier Starmer CategoriesCommunity Expert View Education Expert View Latest Expert Views Our Expert Views

Prevent and the political performance of ‘justice’

Each time tragedy strikes, a predictable script unfolds: politicians stand before the cameras, blaming the toxic Prevent strategy for the atrocity, while presenting it as the solution to protect us against the next. This is part of a downward spiral that we must exit in order to find real solutions. The political performance takes place before the full facts are established—often alongside calls for a “review” or “inquiry,” though logic would dictate that conclusions should follow, not precede, such investigations. In this spectacle, politicians play the roles of decisive leaders, delivering rehearsed lines about the ever-present boogey-man (implied as “Muslims”), while the real threats and root causes remain hidden behind the curtains, never quite making it into the script. Our current Prime Minister and Home Secretary’s response to the Southport attack is one in a long line of familiar instances. A tragic event has been used to reinforce the prevailing […]

picture of the united nations headquarters in geneva for a story on reparations for uk prevent duty CategoriesCommunity Expert View Education Expert View Latest Expert Views Our Expert Views

Why we need to speak about reparations for Prevent in 2025

While much discussion has centred on the UN call to suspend Prevent, little has been said about reparations – this year, it’s time to put the subject on the table. As we enter a new year with a new government and new proposals to be announced for Prevent, it is vital to reflect on Prevent’s decade-long legacy as a statutory duty, specifically what these potential changes—or the lack thereof—mean for those already harmed by Prevent. This reflection gains urgency as we await the UK Government’s response to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination’s (CERD) recommendation to not only suspend Prevent, but to also consider reparations for those harmed by it. While much discussion has centred on the call to suspend Prevent, little has been said about reparations – for example, how do we define ‘harm’ and – importantly – how can it be compensated? Prevent Watch’s extensive […]

CategoriesCommunity Expert View Education Expert View Latest Expert Views Our Expert Views

Lies, Damned Lies and Prevent Statistics

Jump to… Each year, the Home Office presents its Prevent statistics as part of its commitment to transparency. Here we outline THREE reasons why we must not rely upon them as a credible reference point. For every researcher, NGO and individual who has ever requested a Freedom of Information request about Prevent, it is clear that the Home Office has been far from transparent about the operation, delivery and impact of Prevent.  The annual Prevent statistics, and especially their most recent publication on the 5th of December, only serves to reinforce this trend.  While the data presented this year is more detailed than ever before, it paradoxically tells us even less about the reality and impact of Prevent, in particular on children and other vulnerable individuals. The most obvious lie: When the numbers don’t add up This year’s Prevent report breaks precedent by dedicating an entire chapter to trends following […]