University of Huddersfield logo CategoriesGlobal CVE

UK: Prevent strategy expert gives evidence to Australian Royal Commission

Professor Paul Thomas, an expert on the Prevent strategy at the University of Huddersfield, has given evidence before the Australian Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion. Drawing on the UK experience, the professor argued that Australia could benefit from similar approaches to practitioner training and community reporting, while recognising the challenges of implementing a consistent system across a federal structure. Professor Thomas commented: “In my evidence session with the Royal Commission I was able to share the findings from our groundbreaking international research around community members reporting possible terrorism involvement by people known to them, as well as our important national research around how British educators are implementing the Prevent counter-terrorism duty.” Read more on The University of Huddersfield website. Related… After 16-year-old austistic boy is shot by police, experts call for shift in Australia CVE programmes

Logo for The Times CategoriesLatest News

The Times: Home Office slashes funding for Prevent programme

Funding for the Prevent programme has plummeted since the pandemic despite Britain’s growing problem with extremism, according to figures that show parts of London and Birmingham have faced the biggest cuts. The amount spent by the Home Office on the government’s counterterrorism strategy fell from £41 million in 2021-22 to £25 million this financial year, a 39 per cent drop. Read more on The Times. Related… Read our Response to the Home Affairs Select Committee report on New Forms of Extremism

The Taxpayers Alliance logo for article on Prevent strategy CategoriesLatest News

Taxpayers Alliance: Assessment of the Prevent Strategy

The Prevent strategy represents one of the UK’s core branches of counter-terrorism with £36 million in annual expenditure. Yet after two decades of operation, it remains largely unclear how these funds are being spent and whether it delivers value for money. When the TaxPayers’ Alliance last examined Prevent in 2009, detailed funding breakdowns and recipient information were available through freedom of information (FOI) requests to local authorities, enabling proper scrutiny of public expenditure. That note revealed that over £12 million was distributed to community groups with insufficient monitoring of how it was spent between 2006-07 and 2008-09, including £850,000 to Muslim Council of Britain affiliates, an organisation that the government subsequently designated as a ‘non-engagement’ group due to previous leaders taking positions that contradict fundamental British values. Now, the Home Office and local authorities routinely refuse FOI requests on national security and commercial sensitivity grounds, preventing taxpayers from understanding where […]

Logo for the Middle East Eye CategoriesLatest News

Middle East Eye: UK government’s new counter-extremism measures called ‘Prevent on steroids’

The British government has announced contentious new counter-extremism measures inspired by an extremism definition championed by former Conservative minister Michael Gove and denounced by critics as authoritarian, writes Imran Mulla in the Middle East Eye. Earlier this week considerable fanfare surrounded Communities Secretary Steve Reed announcing a new, non-statutory, definition of anti-Muslim hostility. The definition was widely attacked by Reform and Tory politicians who said it undermines free speech. At the same time it was welcomed by some Muslim groups and criticised by others, who argued it was insufficiently strong. But alongside the definition, Reed also announced the adoption of another definition – which went relatively unnoticed in the national media. The Labour government’s “Protecting What Matters” policy, which the anti-Muslim hostility definition was unveiled as part of, introduces a raft of new measures on community cohesion and integration. Read more on The Middle East Eye.

CategoriesLatest News

The Guardian: AI-generated British schoolgirl Amelia is now a far-right social media star

An AI-generated British schoolgirl Amelia, created to deter young people from extremism, has been subverted and is breaking out of niche online silos, reports The Guardian. In certain corners of the internet, on niche news feeds and algorithms, Amelia has emerged as something of a phenomenon. Her name is Amelia, a purple-haired “goth girl” who proudly carries a mini union flag and appears to have a penchant for racism. If you are unfamiliar with Amelia, the chances are you will soon encounter one viral meme or another inspired by her on Facebook or X, where her reputation is growing. Videos of Amelia typically feature her walking through London, or the House of Commons, declaring her love for England and warning of the dangers of “militant Muslims” or “third-world migrants”. In one clip she is harangued by bearded man in Islamic attire for eating a pork sausage. The origins of the […]

Picture of a panel for story on Channel de-radicalisation programme in the UK CategoriesOur Cases Library Community Case Study

Inside Channel: A former Channel panel member speaks out on de-radicalisation programme

I am a senior social worker. For several months, I sat on Channel panels, the end point of the UK government’s controversial de-radicalisation programme Prevent, within my local authority. I was uncomfortable from the outset, not only because of everything I had already heard about Prevent and Channel, but because of what I witnessed first-hand once I was inside the de-radicalisation process. What a Channel panel looks like A Channel panel is a large, formal meeting, usually involving around 10 to 15 people. This includes senior local authority staff, members of the Prevent team, Prevent engagement officers, and counter-terrorism police officers. Cases are discussed one by one. An intervention provider (IP) or engagement officer presents the individual, outlines what contact they have had with them, and explains what they see as the person’s “vulnerabilities”. The panel then decides whether the individual should remain on Channel and what kind of “support […]

CategoriesLatest News Parliamentary Work

Prevent Watch responds to the Bingham Centre’s Independent Commission on UK Counter-Terrorism Law, Policy and Practice

12 November 2025 – Prevent Watch welcomes the publication of the Bingham report and approaches its findings with cautious optimism. The Commission’s conclusions confirm what Prevent Watch has long evidenced through over a decade of frontline casework and in our submissions to the Commission: Prevent is failing. The Prevent strategy relies on unproven theories of radicalisation and results in the surveillance of lawful expression, the stigmatisation of Muslims, and the referral of children and vulnerable people who pose no security risk. Prevent Watch welcomes the report’s call for independent oversight, stronger data protection, and a rights-based approach, including statutory independence for the Prevent Commissioner and an Information Commissioner’s audit of data handling. While the Commission proposes moving Prevent into a locally led, multi-agency safeguarding model, Prevent Watch is concerned that such recommendations could repackage securitisation under a new guise. The report’s call to reconsider the Prevent duty altogether if the […]

CRIN report counter terrorism and children's rights CategoriesEducation Resources Community Resources Reports

CRIN: To Protect or Punish? Children, counter-terrorism and the criminal justice system

CRIN’s latest report shows how all stages of the UK’s counter-terrorism system threaten children’s rights in chilling ways. From pre-criminal, to pre-trial, to trial and sentencing, we need reforms and approaches that genuinely protect children. CRIN has long held concerns over the growth of counter-terrorism strategies and its impact on children’s rights in the UK. Having previously examined the effects of the Prevent strategy on children, this report follows the journey a child might make through the criminal justice system. What happens if a child is accused of counter-terrorism? What determines if a child is brought to a Youth or a Criminal court? How can children be drawn into counter-terrorist policing without committing a criminal act? Our report begins in the pre-criminal space by considering the impact of stop and search practices under counter-terrorism, the Prevent programme and the challenges of counter-terrorist law in digital spaces. It continues into pre-trial […]

CategoriesLatest News

The Guardian: Report into Prevent strategy to suggest ‘new scheme’ to detect people ‘obsessed with violence’

A new scheme to detect people who are obsessed with violence before they kill should be considered by the government, an official report into the Prevent strategy will say. The report into Prevent has been compiled by David Anderson KC, the interim reviewer of Prevent. Anderson’s report was first ordered by the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, in January after revelations in the Guardian that the Southport attacker had been referred three times to Prevent and rejected each time because officials believed he was not motivated by any clear terrorist ideology. Anderson’s report, expected to be published soon, is the first official report after the Southport case to say a new anti-violence scheme needs to be considered for those thought to pose a threat, but where no terrorist ideology is detected. Any new anti-violence scheme would be in addition to Prevent and possibly even include it as a specific element to […]

Logo for the Daily Mail CategoriesLatest News

Daily Mail: Alarm as number of Scots schoolchildren referred to anti-terror scheme doubles in a year

Primary schoolchildren are among Scots who have been referred to the Prevent anti-terror programme, shocking new figures reveal. Police Scotland said the number of cases passed on to experts over radicalisation fears had leapt by nearly a third in the past year. The number of referrals of potential extremists from primary schools – where children can be as young as four – has more than doubled. There were 27 for pupils under the age of 15 – while some were reported to Prevent by members of their own families. Last night Scottish Tory community safety spokesman Sharon Dowey said: “It is deeply alarming that a rising number of referrals to this counter-terror programme are kids of such a young age.” Read more in the Daily Mail. Related… Edinburgh Reporter: Primary school children among those referred to terrorism prevention programme (News, 2024)